Compare elevation data products

Dataset Last checked 24 October 2026

Compare elevation products by their surface representation, reference systems and documented accuracy context before comparing grid spacing. The twenty rows below keep those characteristics separate so a smaller cell size does not stand in for evidence that a product fits your study.

Match the surface to the question

Decide whether your work needs bare ground or a surface that can include vegetation and structures. Write that requirement down before selecting a product. USGS distinguishes the surface types and source products within 3DEP; a product-family name alone is not a complete terrain specification.1

Then consider coverage and collection period. A product may offer broad geographical coverage while combining source observations from different times. The record’s acquisition field is therefore separate from the date on which its documentation was checked. Unknown acquisition details stay unknown rather than borrowing the publication date of a web page.

Use the searchable elevation table to narrow this list by product or descriptive text. It does not select a scientifically suitable product for you. For a step-by-step selection route, start with the elevation hub and keep your project requirements beside the table.

IDProductSurfaceSpacingVertical referenceAccuracy contextTerms
E01USGS 3DEP 1-metre DEMBare earth1 metreUsually NAVD88; regional exceptions require tile metadataQL2-or-better lidar source; no per-tile accuracy establishedUS public domain (USGS-produced)
E02Copernicus GLO-30 DGEDDSM including buildings and vegetation1 arc-second; nominal 30 metresEGM2008, EPSG:3855Product specification: absolute vertical <4 m LE90; not local validationCopernicus DEM ESA–User Licence (instance-specific)
E03ALOS AW3D30DSMNominal 1 arc-second; longitude angular spacing increases at high latitudesEGM96 orthometricQuality fields supplied; no uniform measured local accuracy establishedJAXA Terms of Use of Research Data
E04ArcticDEM 2-metre stripsDSM2 metresWGS84 ellipsoidStrips unregistered to ground control/altimetryNextView / EOCL public DEM release exception
E05GEBCO 2026 gridLand elevation and bathymetry15 arc-secondsAssumed mean sea level; some source datums differGrid spacing is not source-data resolution or accuracyPublic domain (GEBCO terms of use)
E06USGS 3DEP 1/3-arc-second DEMBare-earth seamless terrain1/3 arc-second; approximately 10 m north–southUsually NAVD88; local/NGVD29 exceptions outside CONUSVaries by source project; no uniform local value establishedUS public domain (USGS-produced)
E07USGS 3DEP 1-arc-second DEMBare-earth seamless terrain1 arc-second; approximately 30 m north–southUsually NAVD88; local/NGVD29 exceptions outside CONUSVaries by source project; no uniform local value establishedUS public domain (USGS-produced)
E08USGS Alaska 5-metre IfSAR DEMBare-earth DTM5 metresTile metadata required; do not assume CONUS vertical datumNot established for selected tileUS public domain (USGS-produced)
E09USGS Alaska IfSAR DSMDSM; vegetation and structures included5 metresNot established in inspected sourcesNot established for selected tileUS public domain (USGS-produced)
E10Copernicus GLO-90DSM; buildings and vegetation retained3 arc-seconds; nominal 90 mEGM2008 (EPSG:3855)Product specification <4 m absolute vertical LE90; not local validationCopernicus DEM ESA–User Licence (instance-specific)
E11Copernicus EEA-10DSM; buildings and vegetation retainedDGED 0.4 arc-second; INSPIRE nominal 10 mEGM2008 (EPSG:3855)Product specification <4 m absolute vertical LE90; not local validationCopernicus DEM ESA–User Licence (instance-specific)
E12ArcticDEM mosaicDSM mosaic2 m primary; coarser mosaics also offeredWGS84 ellipsoidMosaic registration and source coverage vary; no local benchmark hereNextView / EOCL public DEM release exception
E13REMA stripsDSM strips2 metresWGS84 ellipsoidStrips not registered to altimetry; mosaic claim does not applyNextView / EOCL public DEM release exception
E14REMA mosaicDSM mosaic2 m; reduced resolutions 10/32 m and whole-domain gridsWGS84 ellipsoidProvider reports <1 m absolute uncertainty over most registered area; not local validationNextView / EOCL public DEM release exception
E15NASADEM HGTRadar-derived terrain/surface with merged fills; not universally bare earth1 arc-secondEGM96 geoid for merged HGT; SRTM-only float product differsReprocessed product; no single local accuracy guaranteeCC0 (unmarked NASA-led mission data; check exceptions)
E16SRTM GL1 v3Radar-derived elevation; vegetation/buildings may influence heights1 arc-secondEGM96USGS describes mission accuracy; no local validation hereCC0 (unmarked NASA-led mission data; check exceptions)
E17CGIAR SRTM 90 mVoid-filled SRTM-derived elevation3 arc-seconds; nominal 90 m at equatorNot established in inspected sourcesPage reports source vertical error <16 m; not independent CGIAR/local validationCIAT SRTM distribution terms
E18MERIT DEMError-reduced terrain estimate3 arc-seconds; nominal 90 m at equatorEGM96 geoidProvider reports 58% of land better than 2 m after correction; not uniform accuracyCC BY-NC 4.0 or ODbL 1.0 (choice; additional condition)
E19FABDEMTerrain estimate with forest/building biases removedUniform 1 arc-second; approximately 30 m at equatorEGM2008 EPSG:3855No single numerical local accuracy claim established hereCC BY-NC-SA 4.0 (commercial permission separate)
E20ASTER GDEM v3Optical-stereo surface elevation1 arc-second; nominal 30 m at equatorEGM96Known inaccuracies/artifacts; no uniform accuracy guaranteedNASA/METI data-use conditions; no separate licence established

Read spacing and accuracy as different fields

Grid spacing describes the arrangement of samples. A stated accuracy measure describes an error assessment under particular conditions. Keep the metric, terrain context and edition together rather than turning every numerical entry into a single comparable score.

This table retains the publisher’s accuracy basis where it was established. “No per-tile accuracy established” means that the inspected family-level evidence does not establish that property for the file you will use. It is not an assertion that a product has no quality documentation. Open the linked source and the selected tile’s metadata for the more specific evidence.

Do not convert arc-seconds to an unexplained fixed metre figure and use it as a universal resolution comparison.2 Preserve the published spacing notation in the acquisition record. If your analysis requires a projected grid, document the later projection and resampling choices as processing decisions rather than changing the source description.

Check vertical reference and units

A shared-looking horizontal grid does not establish compatible heights. Keep the vertical reference and vertical units alongside the horizontal reference. NOAA explains how mixing vertical datums can create discontinuities in a combined surface.3 A visible seam should therefore lead back to these fields as well as to collection dates and processing choices.

Where a source family has regional exceptions, the table says to inspect the actual tile. Avoid replacing that condition with the most common datum for the family. The selected product may require a different reference or an explicit transformation whose coverage and uncertainty must be considered separately.

The DEM inspection guide prepares a metadata command, while the mosaic guide describes a constrained combination workflow. Neither route supplies missing reference information or performs an accuracy validation by reading a file header.

Retain the terms with the product edition

The licence column is a short source label. Read the complete source-linked reuse conditions before downloading or sharing a product. Some entries identify a particular instance or release; others include non-commercial restrictions, geographic exceptions or separate permissions. A freely accessible download is not itself a blanket redistribution statement.

Download the complete JSON or CSV with the method and source ledger. These files preserve twenty product attributes plus source and date information. The original compilation is CC BY 4.0; the underlying elevation products keep their own terms.

Finish by writing a short selection note: product and edition, why its surface fits, coverage evidence, reference systems, unresolved fields and the official item link. That note makes a later change of product explainable without inventing a winner from incomplete or differently defined accuracy figures.

Not covered on this page

Sources

  1. USGS: About 3DEP products and services. ↩

  2. NOAA: GLOBE grid spacing and resolution. ↩

  3. NOAA: About VDatum. ↩

Code on this page is original and MIT licensed.

How we test: methodology. Found a mistake? Corrections.